jamesMMFRP 发表于 1970-1-1 08:00:00

Why? (加拿大化学教授与3岁女儿的对话)

êêêêêCanada's ScienceCreative Quarterly recently published an article entitledA dialogue with Sarah, aged 3:In which it is shown that if your dad is a chemistry professor asking “Why?”can be dangerous.By Stephen McNeilêêêêêSarah: Daddy, were you in the shower?Dad: Yes, I was in the shower.Sarah: Why?Dad: I was dirty. The shower gets me clean.Sarah: Why?Dad: Why does the shower get me clean?Sarah: Why?Dad: Because the water washes the dirt away when Iuse soap.Sarah: Why?Dad: Why do I use soap?Sarah: Yes.Dad: Because the soap grabs the dirt and lets thewater wash it off.Sarah: Why?Dad: Why does the soap grab the dirt?Sarah: Yes.Dad: Because soap is a surfactant.Sarah: Why?Dad: Why is soap a surfactant?Sarah: Yes.Dad: That is an EXCELLENT question. Soap is a surfactant because it formswater-soluble micelles that trap the otherwise insoluble dirt and oilparticles.Sarah: Why?Dad: Why does soap form micelles?Sarah: Yes.Dad: Soap molecules are long chains with a polar, hydrophilic head and anon-polar, hydrophobic tail. Can yousay ‘hydrophilic’ ?Sarah: Aidrofawwic.(卿穗 或 七─鼠─尾─)Dad: And can you say ‘hydrophobic’ ?Sarah: Aidrofawwic.(苏穗 或 叔─鼠─尾─)Dad: Excellent! The word ‘hydrophobic’ means that it avoids water.Sarah: Why?Dad: Why does it mean that?Sarah: Yes.Dad: It’s Greek! ‘Hydro’ means water and ‘phobic’ means ‘fear of’. ‘Phobos’is fear. So ‘hydrophobic’ means ‘afraid of water’.Sarah: Like a monster?Dad: You mean, like being afraid of a monster?Sarah: Yes.Dad: A scary monster, sure. If you were afraid of a monster, a Greek personwould say you were gorgo phobic. (希腊语gorgóz(gorgós)是“可怕的”意思,蛇发女妖戈尔贡(gorgon)之名也是出于此)êêêêê(pause) êêêêêSarah: (rolls her eyes) I thought we weretalking about soap.Dad: We are talking about soap.êêêêê(longish pause)êêêêêSarah: Why?Dad: Why do the molecules have a hydrophilic head and a hydrophobic tail?Sarah: Yes.Dad: Because the C-O bonds in the head are highlypolar, and the C-H bonds in the tail are effectively non-polar.Sarah: Why?Dad: Because while carbon and hydrogen have almost the sameelectronegativity, oxygen is far more electronegative, thereby polarizing theC-O bonds.Sarah: Why?Dad: Why is oxygen more electronegative thancarbon and hydrogen?Sarah: Yes.Dad: That’s complicated. There are different answers to that question,depending on whether you’re talking about the Pauling or Mullikenelectronegativity scales. The Pauling scale is based on homo- versusheteronuclear bond strength differences, while the Mulliken scale is based onthe atomic properties of electron affinity and ionization energy. But it reallyall comes down to effective nuclear charge. The valence electrons in an oxygenatom have a lower energy than those of a carbon atom, and electrons sharedbetween them are held more tightly to the oxygen, because electrons in anoxygen atom experience a greater nuclear charge and therefore a strongerattraction to the atomic nucleus! Cool, huh?êêêêê(pause) êêêêêSarah: I don’t get it.Dad: That’s OK. Neither do most of my students.êêêêêAbout Stephen McNeilStephen McNeil is an Assistant Professor of Chemistry at the University of British Columbia Okanagan in Kelowna, British Columbia. To date, he hasbeen interviewed on the radio four times: twice he was talking about chemistry,and twice he was talking about pirates. His favourite element is the element ofsurprise.êêêêê这是原对话出处:http://www.scq.ubc.ca/a-dialogue-with-sarah-aged-3-in-which-it-is-shown-that-if-your-dad-is-a-chemistry-professor-asking-%E2%80%9Cwhy%E2%80%9D-can-be-dangerous-2/

zy7181 发表于 1970-1-1 08:00:00

谢谢楼主分享。{:1106_362:}

幽谷猿啸 发表于 1970-1-1 08:00:00

if your dad is a chemistry professor asking “Why?”can be dangerous.

jiaohw910 发表于 1970-1-1 08:00:00

很有耐心的父亲啊

87737352 发表于 1970-1-1 08:00:00

E文的,看着费点劲。

saintcaptain 发表于 1970-1-1 08:00:00

十万个为什么

飞奔的蜗牛77 发表于 1970-1-1 08:00:00

很幽默的故事。                           

zjwmcl 发表于 1970-1-1 08:00:00

值得我们中国家长深思!

jamesMMFRP 发表于 1970-1-1 08:00:00

87737352 发表于 2014-9-22 08:45
E文的,看着费点劲。

费点儿劲,花点儿时间,一回生,二回熟!

展盼 发表于 1970-1-1 08:00:00

路过,围观下

wklbuct 发表于 1970-1-1 08:00:00

今天马后炮换图标了

感冒清热颗粒 发表于 1970-1-1 08:00:00

今天看的第一篇帖子。

波波 发表于 1970-1-1 08:00:00

看不懂!
英文太烂!

fl202 发表于 1970-1-1 08:00:00

Neither do most of my students.

It‘sOK。

gd0308 发表于 1970-1-1 08:00:00

看来要向加拿大的那位父亲学习

danish 发表于 1970-1-1 08:00:00

不错,这个3岁小孩逆天了

qzshi68 发表于 1970-1-1 08:00:00

3岁小孩就有这种对话,太神奇了。

haowll 发表于 1970-1-1 08:00:00

中国教育家应该思考思考!

hzm888 发表于 1970-1-1 08:00:00

嘻嘻哈哈!!!嗯,非常不错的电话。。。。

dqllcy 发表于 1970-1-1 08:00:00

{:1106_362:}
页: [1] 2
查看完整版本: Why? (加拿大化学教授与3岁女儿的对话)