本帖最后由 dahei9971 于 2014-9-12 09:27 编辑
While analyzing a piping system you many times will come across with few supports which will take load in sustained case but are not taking load in operating and design temperature cases (Refer Attached Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 for one such typical example). The support is lifting at that point in temperature case i.e. supports are not contributing in load and stress distribution while in in operating condition. Still in that situation the weight of pipe and pressure inside the system will induce sustained stresses. So in my opinion, hot sustained stress is the sustained stress in pipe operating situation. And we must ensure that the system stress will not fail because of those supports not sharing any load. That is why many organization make it mandatory to check sustained stresses. Hot Sustained Stress Checking in Caesar II Fig.1: Caesar II Restraint summary showing lifting supports Methods of Sustained stress checking: I have come across with two different methods of hot sustained stress check in various organization: 1. Conventional Method followed by many organizations: In first method the analyst has to run the static analysis as per conventional method. Now go to restraint summary and note down the support nodes which are lifting or not taking any vertical load (Sometimes small positive value may be there due to guide and line stop frictions, in that case check the vertical displacement if it shows positive value consider the same as lifting). Make a separate Caesar file with name FILE NAME_HOT SUSTAINED. Open the input screen and delete all lifting supports from the nodes you noted down. Delete only +Y support, Guide and line stops will be there. Run the analysis and check sustained stress. If sustained stress is within allowable limit accept the file as it is else change the support location or routing to make the system safe. Fig.2: Caesar II Plot showing lifting support
2. New method followed by very few organizations: In this method analyst will check the hot sustained stress in the same main file (No need to create separate file). Some additional load cases are required. Lets assume we will check hot sustained stress in design temperature, T1 condition (means we will check which supports are lifting in design temp case). So the below mentioned cases is required for hot sustained stress checking L1: W+T1+P1 OPE L2: T1 OPE/EXP L3: L1-L2 SUS Check the stresses for load case L3, if the same is within allowable limit then accept the file else make the system safe. Notes: Now you may be thinking whether to mark deleted supports in isometric or not. You must mark those supports. As we have not deleted the supports in actual practice. Supports will be there at site, We simply ensured that without those supports also system will be safe. However if you want to delete those supports that can be done if all other stress criteria can met. Whether we need to check expansion stresses in hot sustained file too? In my opinion if we are using liberal stress for expansion stress range checking then it is better to check expansion stress (along with sustained stress) in hot sustained file. Otherwise it is not required as system won’t fail in expansion case even after removing those supports. | 
IP卡
狗仔卡
发表于 1970-1-1 08:00:00
提升卡
置顶卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
千斤顶
显身卡